Becoming a football pundit has never been an easy task. Regardless of expertise, dissenting opinions are inevitable. Even minor slip-ups or nervous moments, heightened in the live broadcast crucible, can subject pundits to public backlash.
A tally of respected pundits versus those who falter reveals the latter often outweighs the former. In today’s era of real-time social media feedback, the scrutiny on ex-players in the studio can surpass their on-field pressures.
Sadly, not everyone radiates Gary Neville or Jamie Carragher’s charisma under the spotlight. With this in mind, let’s spotlight pundits frequently singled out for their missteps.
BBC mainstay Mark Lawrenson’s role on Match of the Day has been reduced lately, as the broadcaster aims to freshen up a somewhat stale and complacent format.
Though Lawro offers valuable insights, his analysis occasionally drowns in unnecessary sarcasm and lacks precision. He often falters in his match-day predictions (as anyone would). One season, his predictions that QPR would finish eighth and Swansea would face relegation missed the mark by a country mile.
You can always compare your selections against his before placing wagers. The Bet.co.za bonus code can boost your stake when betting on EPL matches, but terms and conditions apply.
In the latter part of his playing career, Michael Owen became a familiar presence on the Match of the Day set. His monotone delivery and unremarkable viewpoints often served as a remedy for Sunday night insomnia.
Now retired, Owen has taken up different roles as a full-time pundit.
Despite his amiable demeanor, Owen’s voice lacks the vibrancy required for the passion of football. Moreover, his judgments frequently fall wide of the mark. Top analysts can occasionally err in their predictions, but Owen’s article in the Telegraph, suggesting that Arsenal didn’t have the look of a top-four contender, appeared rather shallow.
Alan Shearer’s analysis has progressed in recent years, although it still tends to stay on the surface.
When dissecting a goal replay, his comments often don’t go much beyond, “The ball came in from the right, he jumped and headed it into the net.”
Essentially, he highlights the obvious, providing fewer insights than one would anticipate from his successful playing career (and his short, ill-fated managerial role).
Redknapp faced criticism for his questionable grasp of English, and his preference for flashy, snug suits. However, it’s his heavy reliance on clichés and reluctance to critique friends and ex-teammates that sparks doubts about his prowess.
During Euro 2004, The Guardian’s Michael Cox highlighted an incident when Redknapp refrained from acknowledging mistakes by former colleagues David James and Steven Gerrard in England’s defeat to France.
Although Redknapp is personable, standing out can be tough in the company of seasoned pundits.
For those not in North America, it might come as news that Piers Morgan occasionally appeared as a pundit on Fox Soccer.
There was a time whenever Arsenal played, the ex-tabloid editor would make his appearance, passionately demanding Arsene Wenger’s dismissal, showing limited appreciation for the game’s intricacies, and previewing his upcoming segment points via tweets during commercial breaks.
This hyperbolic journalist certainly has his critics and has openly acknowledged that his opinions can tend to be “over-emotional, angry, reactive, and inconsistent.”