Connect with us


Entertainment

Why House of the Dragon season 2 was underwhelming

Published

on

Why House of the Dragon season 2 was underwhelming

House of the Dragon season 2 was evidently a trailer for season 3 based on how the story arcs left fans confused and wanting, but it’s now revealed that it wasn’t the intention but a victim of 3rd party power-play.

Just when we thought HBO had learned from the backlash of Game of Thrones‘ final season, it seems history is repeating itself. Fans of House of the Dragon were left scratching their heads after the second season wrapped up with only eight episodes, leaving out pivotal moments that should have been the season’s grand finale.

The disappointment is palpable, with the same divisive atmosphere that clouded the end of Game of Thrones now looming over this beloved prequel series.

So, why did the season feel so underwhelming?

Read More:

How ‘House of the Dragon’ has set up Daemon Targaryen’s fate

House of the Dragon S02 Episode 7: “What makes us special?”

According to insiders and some digging by fans on Reddit, the answer is as frustrating as it is familiar—money. Despite being HBO’s flagship show, House of the Dragon was reportedly shortchanged, leading to a truncated season that left viewers hanging.

The original plan was for the second season to include major events from the Dance of the Dragons, like the Battle of the Gullet and the Fall of King’s Landing, spread across a full ten episodes. But instead, budget cuts and a lack of time to rewrite the season led to these crucial moments being pushed to season three.

It’s no secret that George R.R. Martin, the mastermind behind A Song of Ice and Fire and Fire & Blood, had initially advocated for four full seasons of ten episodes each to properly tell the Dance of the Dragons saga.

However, the showrunners, constrained by a reduced budget and the looming writers’ strike, were forced to make tough decisions. Ryan Condal, the head writer and showrunner, admitted in a recent interview that while they wanted to give the Battle of the Gullet the grandeur it deserves, they simply didn’t have the resources to do it justice this season.

The impact of these budget cuts is already being felt, and not just in House of the Dragon. The decision to scale back could have ripple effects on the entire Game of Thrones franchise. With the future of Westeros in jeopardy, fans are now questioning whether spinoffs like A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms will even stand a chance if House of the Dragon continues to disappoint.

HBO’s leadership seems to be playing a dangerous game, saving millions now at the risk of losing billions in the long run. Their decision to cut corners with the show has left fans concerned about the quality of future seasons.

With season three reportedly set to follow the same pattern of just eight episodes, the fear is that House of the Dragon could suffer the same fate as Game of Thrones, where rushed storytelling and budget constraints led to a massive drop in viewership and a tarnished legacy.

It’s ironic that HBO, a network that once poured endless resources into Game of Thrones, is now tightening the purse strings on what could be its next golden goose.

The success of House of the Dragon is crucial not just for its own future, but for the success of any other Game of Thrones projects in development. HBO should be cautious; if they continue to undermine the potential of House of the Dragon, they might find themselves driving away the very audience that helped build their empire.

Trending

Exit mobile version